Where This Fits in the Claim Process
A denial based on “inconsistent statements” usually happens during the insurer’s investigation stage. The adjuster is deciding whether the crash qualifies for coverage (often under uninsured motorist coverage for a hit-and-run) and whether the injuries and vehicle damage match the reported event. In North Carolina, hit-and-run UM claims can have specific reporting and notice requirements, so insurers often look closely at timing, details, and whether there was actual contact between vehicles.
Practical Steps That Usually Help
-
Get the denial reason in writing (and make it specific):
Ask the insurer to identify exactly what statements they claim conflict, who made them, when they were made, and what policy provision or rule they are relying on. You want a clear, written explanation tied to the facts and the policy language, not a vague conclusion.
-
Build one clean timeline and stick to it:
Most “inconsistencies” are really memory issues (stress, pain, confusion about directions/lanes, or mixing up times). Create a simple timeline: when the crash happened, when law enforcement was notified, when the insurer was notified, when you sought care, and what symptoms started when. Then use documents to back it up (photos with timestamps, phone logs, tow/repair paperwork, and visit summaries).
-
Confirm the hit-and-run UM requirements were met:
North Carolina’s UM statute includes special rules for hit-and-run situations, including prompt reporting to law enforcement (generally within 24 hours or as soon as practicable) and notice to the insurer within a reasonable time. It also commonly turns on whether there was a “collision” (physical contact) involving the unidentified vehicle. If the insurer is denying because they believe the legal requirements were not met, you want to address that head-on with the report, photos of impact points, and consistent descriptions of contact.
See generally N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-279.21 (uninsured motorist coverage; hit-and-run provisions).
-
Use the crash report carefully (helpful, but not perfect):
A law-enforcement crash report can support timing, location, and the basic narrative. But it can also contain errors or incomplete details, especially if the officer did not witness the crash. If the insurer is using the report to claim your story changed, compare the report to what you actually said and what the physical evidence shows. If there is a clear factual mistake, you can ask about the agency’s process for supplements or corrections (not every issue can be changed, but documentation helps).
North Carolina’s accident reporting rules are in N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-166.1.
-
Control future communications (especially recorded statements):
If the insurer wants another statement, ask for the topics in advance and take time to review your timeline first. Keep answers accurate and limited to what you know. If you do not remember a detail, it is better to say that than to guess. Avoid “filling in” missing facts—guesses are a common source of later “inconsistencies.”
-
Document injury timing without overstating it:
Insurers often compare what was reported at the scene versus what was reported at urgent care days later. Chest pain and foot/ankle swelling may be taken seriously, but gaps in follow-up can give the insurer an argument that symptoms resolved or were unrelated. Without giving medical advice, you can still document the non-medical facts: when symptoms started, what limited your activities, and what prevented follow-up (for example, difficulty getting an appointment). Keep it consistent with what you told providers.
-
Be careful with Medicaid-related paperwork:
If Medicaid paid for crash-related care, there may be reimbursement issues later if the claim is paid. That is not a reason to deny coverage, but it is a reason to keep your bills and payment records organized and to avoid informal side deals that create confusion about what was paid and why.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Trying to “fix” the story by changing details: If something was wrong or unclear, correct it once, clearly, and with supporting documents. Multiple changing versions usually make denials harder to reverse.
- Arguing on the phone without a paper trail: Follow up important points in writing (email or letter) so the record is clear.
- Guessing about speed, distances, or exact times: Estimates can be fine if labeled as estimates. Problems happen when estimates get repeated later as “facts.”
- Overlooking North Carolina’s contributory negligence risk: If the insurer can argue you contributed to the crash in any way, it may try to use that to deny liability. That makes consistent, evidence-based statements even more important in NC.
How This Applies
Apply to your facts: Because the denial is tied to “statements don’t match,” the fastest way to push back is to demand a written, detailed explanation of the alleged inconsistencies and then respond with one consolidated timeline supported by the crash report, photos, and urgent care paperwork. Since this is a hit-and-run, it also matters that the crash was reported to law enforcement and that notice was given to the insurer within a reasonable time under North Carolina’s UM hit-and-run rules. The gap in follow-up care can be used against you, so keep your non-medical documentation (appointment attempts, work impact, and symptom timeline) consistent with what providers recorded.
Conclusion
A denial based on “inconsistent statements” can sometimes be challenged by tightening the record: get the insurer’s reasons in writing, correct the timeline once with documents, and make sure the hit-and-run UM requirements (prompt reporting and timely notice) are clearly shown. Because small differences can get treated as big credibility issues, keep communications controlled and consistent. One practical next step is to gather your report, photos, call logs, and medical visit paperwork and have a North Carolina attorney review the denial letter and your timeline before you submit more statements.
