Not necessarily. In North Carolina, chiropractic care can be appropriate accident treatment, and chiropractic records and bills can support an injury claim. The bigger issues are whether the care looks medically reasonable for your symptoms, whether your records clearly connect your condition to the crash, and whether any gaps in treatment (like a short break for travel) are explained and documented.
In North Carolina, if you were hurt in an accident and you are only seeing a chiropractor (and you had a short break in treatment due to travel), you may wonder whether the insurance company will treat your care as “real” medical treatment and whether that could hurt your personal injury claim.
In a North Carolina injury claim, you generally must prove (1) you were injured, (2) the accident caused the injury, and (3) the medical care you received was reasonably necessary and the charges were reasonable. Chiropractic treatment can fit within “medical charges” and can be used to prove damages, but insurers often scrutinize it more closely than emergency room or physician care—especially if the records are thin, the treatment continues for a long time without clear objective findings, or there are unexplained gaps.
Even when your bills are accepted as reasonable, North Carolina law still treats “reasonableness” and “causation” as separate issues. In other words, a bill can be reasonable in amount, but the insurer can still argue the treatment was not necessary because of this accident. Good documentation and consistent care (or a clearly explained interruption) helps address that.
Apply the Rule to the Facts: Because you have an open claim based on a police report and you are treating with a chiropractor, your case will likely turn on whether your chiropractic notes and billing clearly document accident-related complaints, objective findings, and a reasonable course of care. Your short break in treatment due to travel is not automatically a problem, but it should be explained consistently (including in your history to the provider) so the insurer cannot frame it as “you stopped because you were better.” If the chiropractor’s records show ongoing symptoms, periodic re-evaluations, and a plan that makes sense for your condition, chiropractic-only care can still support your claim.
Chiropractic-only treatment is not automatically a problem for an accident claim in North Carolina. The key is proving the accident caused your injuries and that the chiropractic care was reasonably necessary, with records that clearly document your symptoms, findings, and progress—including a consistent explanation for any short break in treatment. Next step: make sure your chiropractor’s office provides complete, itemized bills and full treatment records, and do it early enough that you can still file suit within the 3-year deadline if needed.
If you're dealing with accident injuries and you’re concerned that chiropractic-only care (or a gap in treatment) could be used against you, a personal injury attorney can help you understand how insurers evaluate these records, what documentation matters most, and how to protect your timelines. Call [CONTACT NUMBER] to discuss your options.
Disclaimer: This article provides general information about North Carolina law based on the single question stated above. It is not legal advice for your specific situation and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Laws, procedures, and local practice can change and may vary by county. If you have a deadline, act promptly and speak with a licensed North Carolina attorney.