Short Answer
You can challenge responsibility by gathering evidence showing what the other person did wrong and why your own actions were reasonable. Video footage may be especially important, but it should be preserved quickly and reviewed alongside witness accounts, photographs, officer materials, and other records. Under North Carolina law, contributory negligence can seriously affect a personal injury claim, so the evidence must address both sides of the fault dispute.
What Does It Mean to Prove You Were Not Responsible?
Proving that you were not responsible usually involves more than simply disagreeing with an insurance adjuster. In a North Carolina personal injury claim, the available evidence generally must show that another person failed to use reasonable care, that this conduct caused the incident, and that the incident caused your injuries and losses.
You should also be prepared to answer any claim that your own conduct helped cause the incident. For example, the insurer may question where you were positioned, what you could see, how quickly you reacted, or whether you followed an applicable safety rule. The exact issues depend on whether the incident involved a vehicle, a dangerous property condition, or another type of accident.
An insurer's denial is its claim decision based on the information it has reviewed. It is not necessarily the final word on legal responsibility. New evidence can sometimes cause an adjuster to reconsider, although reconsideration does not guarantee that the decision will change.
Why the Video Footage May Matter
When an officer references video footage, obtaining the recording can be a priority. Video may show the movement and location of the people or vehicles involved, visibility conditions, signals, warnings, timing, or events immediately before and after the incident. It may also confirm or contradict statements given to the officer or insurer.
Recordings are not always kept for long. Some systems automatically overwrite footage, and an ordinary request may not require the organization to retain or release it. A prompt written preservation request can identify the incident and ask the organization not to erase, alter, or overwrite potentially relevant material.
The request should be specific enough to help locate the recording. Useful details may include:
- The date and approximate time of the incident.
- The exact location and direction in which the camera was facing.
- A description of the people, vehicles, or area shown.
- The officer's name, agency, and report number, if available.
- A request to preserve footage from a reasonable period before and after the incident.
- A request to retain the original-quality file and related identifying information.
Keep a copy of the request and proof that it was delivered. If footage is received, preserve the original file. Avoid trimming, adding captions, converting the format, or otherwise changing it. A working copy can be made for viewing while the original remains unchanged.
Other Evidence That Can Help Resolve Fault
Video should not be evaluated in isolation. The insurer may argue that the recording is incomplete, unclear, or missing an important angle. Supporting evidence can help explain what the footage shows and fill gaps that the camera did not capture.
Officer and incident records
Obtain the incident or crash report and ask what additional materials may exist. Depending on the agency and event, an officer's file may contain field notes, diagrams, photographs, recorded statements, dispatch information, 911 records, measurements, or video. Access rules vary, and some materials may require a formal records request or other legal process.
Witness information
Identify witnesses who personally saw or heard relevant events. Save their names, telephone numbers, email addresses, and a brief description of what each person observed. A firsthand account made while memories are fresh may be more useful than a general statement obtained months later.
Photographs and physical details
Preserve photographs of the scene, property damage, debris, marks on the ground, lighting, signs, signals, obstructions, and weather conditions. Original image files may contain date and time information, so keep them rather than relying only on screenshots or social media copies.
Claim communications
Save the denial letter, claim number, adjuster emails, recorded-statement requests, and any message saying the insurer may reconsider after receiving the video. Ask the insurer to identify the factual basis for its denial in writing. That information can help focus the investigation on the precise conduct the insurer claims made you responsible.
For a broader discussion of the records commonly used in a disputed claim, see this guide to evidence that may help establish fault when an insurer denies responsibility.
North Carolina's Contributory Negligence Rule
North Carolina allows contributory negligence to be raised as a defense. If the defense proves that an injured person's own failure to use reasonable care helped cause the injury, that finding can create serious problems for the claim. Under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-139, the party asserting contributory negligence generally has the burden of proving that defense.
This does not mean an injured person can wait for the insurer to prove its position. A strong liability presentation should affirmatively explain:
- What duty or safety rule applied to the other person.
- What the other person did or failed to do.
- How that conduct caused the incident.
- Why your actions were reasonable under the circumstances.
- How the video and other records support that account.
Statements should be accurate and consistent with the available evidence. Avoid guessing about speeds, distances, timing, or details you do not remember. Do not post footage or commentary about the incident on social media while the dispute is being reviewed.
How This Applies to the Insurance Denial
Here, the insurer has denied the personal injury claim but indicated that it may reconsider if the footage referenced by the officer is produced. The immediate practical task is to identify who controls the recording, send a precise preservation and production request, and document every attempt to obtain it.
If the footage is obtained, it should be reviewed before being submitted. The review should determine whether it covers the correct time and location, whether any portion appears missing, and how it fits with the officer's report and witness accounts. When sending it to the insurer, include a concise written explanation identifying what the recording shows and how it addresses the stated reason for denial. Keep the original submission, proof of delivery, and the insurer's response.
If the organization refuses to release the recording, says it no longer exists, or does not respond, other options may depend on who owns the footage and whether a lawsuit has been filed. An attorney can assess whether a subpoena, public-records procedure, or another formal step is available. A subpoena generally is not something an injured person can issue merely because an insurance claim is open.
Do Not Let Reconsideration Cause a Missed Deadline
Many North Carolina personal injury actions are subject to a three-year filing period under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-52, although a different deadline may apply depending on the claim, defendant, and circumstances. Asking for footage, appealing an insurance denial, or discussing reconsideration with an adjuster does not automatically extend the deadline for filing a lawsuit.
Preserving evidence and monitoring the legal deadline are separate tasks. If a government body may be involved or substantial time has already passed, prompt review is particularly important because different procedures or notice requirements may apply.
Information to Gather Now
- The written insurance denial and any explanation of the fault decision.
- The message stating that video could lead to reconsideration.
- The officer's report, notes, and contact information.
- The name and address of the organization believed to possess the footage.
- Copies of preservation requests and delivery confirmations.
- Original photographs, videos, and electronic files.
- Witness names and current contact details.
- A factual timeline of the incident written from your own memory.
- Medical records, bills, and visit summaries connecting the claimed injuries to the incident.
When Wallace Pierce Law May Be Able to Help
Wallace Pierce Law may be able to review the insurer's stated reason for denial, compare it with the available evidence, and identify what additional material is needed to address fault. That work may include preparing a focused preservation request, seeking officer materials, contacting witnesses, reviewing footage in its original form, and presenting the evidence to the insurer in an organized way.
If the footage cannot be obtained voluntarily, the firm can evaluate whether another lawful process may be available. It can also assess potential contributory negligence arguments and track the filing deadline while the insurer considers additional evidence. Whether the denial can be changed will depend on the facts, the quality of the evidence, and the applicable North Carolina law.